Hi Vitalie,
My name is Jason and I am an independent advisor and windows user like yourself.
That's a fun and very philosophical way to approach a mathematical concept!
In short, the conflict you're describing exists primarily because you are mixing the formal, strict rules of mathematics (which define parity) with the informal, intuitive rules of language and real-world counting (which often imply existence).
In mathematics, there is no debate: Zero (0) is an even number. This is not a convention but a consequence of its properties.
Why Zero is Mathematically Even (Ignoring Units)
The core definition of an even number is:
An integer n is even if and only if it can be written in the form n=2k, where k is an integer.
If we substitute n=0:
0=2×k
We can easily solve this by setting k=0. Since k=0 is an integer, 0 is mathematically even.
Your proposed theorem ("Zero has neutral parity") contradicts this fundamental definition, and the idea of "units 1" is not how parity is formally defined in number theory.
Answering Your Questions (Applying the "0 is Even" Rule)
Your real-world questions work by equating "count of zero" with "even". This is where the funny results come from—the answers are factually correct based on the count, but linguistically absurd because "even" implies a grouping that doesn't exist when the count is zero.
| Question | Count | Answer Based on Count | Linguistic Implication (The Absurdity) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snakes will mean to have an odd or an even count of legs? | 0 | Even | Snakes are well-paired! |
| Snakes will mean to have an odd or an even count of legs? | 0 | Even | Snakes are well-paired! |
| Pigs will mean to have an odd or an even count of wings? | 0 | Even | Pigs have a countable, even number of wings (zero). |
| Humans will mean to have an odd or an even count of horns? | 0 | Even | We are perfectly symmetrical in our lack of horns. |
| After chicken head cutoff will it mean to have an odd or an even count of heads? | 0 | Even | The lack of a head is an even number of heads. |
| At night will it mean to have an odd or an even count of Suns visible in the sky? | 0 | Even | The suns are neatly paired up (by being absent). |
| An apple will mean to have an odd or an even count of noses? | 0 | Even | Apples have an even number of noses. |
| Roosters will mean to lay an odd or an even count of eggs? | 0 | Even | Roosters lay an even number of eggs (zero). |
| Jesus Christ had an odd or an even count of computers before the computer era? | 0 | Even | Zero is even, so he had an even number of computers. |
Export to Sheets
The Intuition vs. Formalism Conflict
The humorous (or absurd) results come from the clash between:
Formal Math: Count = 0. Since 0 is even, the property is "even." (Correct ✅)
Intuition/Language: People don't naturally say, "I have an even number of gold bars," when they have none. The word "even" in everyday language implies at least two items that can be divided into pairs.
This is why your specific real-world examples feel wrong: parity (odd/even) is a property of the number itself, but when you apply it to a zero count of an object, your brain focuses on the non-existence of the object rather than the numerical property of the count.
For technical tools like Excel's ISEVEN function, it must follow the strict mathematical rule that 0=2×0, and therefore, ISEVEN(0) must return TRUE. Hope this makes sense